Legal Opinion

Wright v. Groom

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided November 30, 1912PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from Shannon Circuit Court — How. W. N. Evans, Judge. The test in this State as to whether an amended petition is a new cause of action and departure from the original is whether the same evidence will support both petitions, and second, whether the same measure of damages will apply to both. It is hardly conceivable that the title to a tract of land in one section would be exactly the same as the title to a tract of land in another section.

Read the full summary

Appeal from Shannon Circuit Court — How. W. N. Evans, Judge. The test in this State as to whether an amended petition is a new cause of action and departure from the original is whether the same evidence will support both petitions, and second, whether the same measure of damages will apply to both. It is hardly conceivable that the title to a tract of land in one section would be exactly the same as the title to a tract of land in another section. Different proof would be .required in the separate actions. This is an attempt to tack on to the first suit an entirely new suit. ■ There is not…

1Opinion of the CourtLamm, J.

Ejectment in the Shannon Circuit Court. Defendants (claiming a departure) challenge an amended petition by motion to strike out. Unsuccessful, they refuse to appear further, stand on their motion, suffer judgment, duly except and appeal. The departure is said to arise in an amendment changing the description of the land. Monthly rents and profits, damages, date of ouster and parties, are the same in both petitions. The change in description appears in the following excerpts, one from the first and the other from the last petition:'

Original Petition.

“Beginning at the southeast corner of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. House v. DuncanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1872
  2. Heilbron v. HeinlenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Waverly Timber & Iron Co. v. St. Louis Cooperage Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1892
  4. Bricken v. CrossSupreme Court of Missouri · 1901
  5. Callaghan v. M'MahanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1862

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Kregain v. BlakeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1922
  2. Oakley v. RichardsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1918
  3. Lee v. W. E. Fuetterer Battery & Supplies Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1929
  4. Kansas City v. WoerishoefferSupreme Court of Missouri · 1913
  5. Montague v. Missouri & Kansas Interurban Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1921

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API