Legal Opinion

State v. Clements

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided October 10, 1939No. 27,228PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTremain, J.

The appellee, a constable, was prosecuted by affidavit for the violation of chapter 94, Acts 1939, p. 503, being secs. 9-701a and 9-701b Burns’ Ind. St. 1933 (Pocket Supp.), §§11199-1, 11199-2 Baldwin’s Supp. 1939. The title of this chapter is: “An act limiting the authority of constables to make arrests in certain cases, and providing penalties thereof, repealing all laws in conflict therewith, and declaring an emergency.” The act provides that “no constable shall have authority as such constable to make an arrest and detain any person or persons for any violation of any law or laws…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Miles v. Department of TreasuryIndiana Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Henderson v. State ex rel. StoutIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Lutz, Atty.-Gen. v. Arnold, Atty. Tr.Indiana Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Carr v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Kelly v. FinneyIndiana Supreme Court · 1935

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Book v. State Office Building CommissionIndiana Supreme Court · 1958
  2. State v. BuxtonIndiana Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Wallman v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. Progressive Improvement Assoc. v. Catch All Corp.Indiana Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Book v. State Office Building CommissionIndiana Supreme Court · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API