Legal Opinion
Perotti v. Black & Decker (U.S.) Inc.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided June 4, 2002No. 1:01 CV 2120PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO REMAND
WELLS, District Judge.
Before the Court is plaintiffs motion to remand. (Docket # 9). An opposition and a reply have been filed. (Docket # 11,12).
For the reasons that follow, the motion to remand is granted.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiff Patrick J. Perotti (“Perotti”) filed this putative nationwide class action in the Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas. This case was removed by Defendant Black & Decker (U.S.) Inc. (“Black & Decker”) to federal district court on 5 September 2001 on the basis of diversity of citizenship. (Docket # 1).
Pe…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Snyder v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Zahn v. International Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Carol L. Kirchner GAFFORD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
- Leroy Alexander v. Electronic Data Systems Corporation James Jeros Steven Brechtelsbauer Jane DoeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Harris v. Physicians Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2003
- Garbaccio v. Columbia Gas Transmission Corp.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2003