Legal Opinion

City of Cleveland v. Walters

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided October 24, 1994No. 66999PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

David T. Matia, Judge.

Michael Walters, defendant-appellant, was initially indicted for menacing by stalking in violation of R.C. 2903.211. The appeal stems from his plea of no contest to a reduced charge of menacing in violation of Cleveland Municipal Code 621.07. Appellant argues the “stalking statute” is unconstitutionally overbroad and vague and that the trial court erred in granting a mistrial that was not required by manifest necessity.

Appellant’s appeal is well taken.

I. STATEMENT OF FACTS

In September 1992, Michael Walters began a relationship with Christine Brogan. In October of that…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  2. United States v. PerezSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  3. State v. SageOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  4. State v. WidnerOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  5. State v. GreenOhio Court of Appeals · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. EalyOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
  2. State v. PowersOhio Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. State v. McMillen, 2008-Ca-00122 (1-20-2009)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009
  4. State v. SecessionsOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
  5. State v. Howard, 06ap-1273 (10-23-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API