City of Cleveland v. Walters
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
David T. Matia, Judge.
Michael Walters, defendant-appellant, was initially indicted for menacing by stalking in violation of R.C. 2903.211. The appeal stems from his plea of no contest to a reduced charge of menacing in violation of Cleveland Municipal Code 621.07. Appellant argues the “stalking statute” is unconstitutionally overbroad and vague and that the trial court erred in granting a mistrial that was not required by manifest necessity.
Appellant’s appeal is well taken.
I. STATEMENT OF FACTS
In September 1992, Michael Walters began a relationship with Christine Brogan. In October of that…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court · 1983
- United States v. PerezSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- State v. SageOhio Supreme Court · 1987
- State v. WidnerOhio Supreme Court · 1981
- State v. GreenOhio Court of Appeals · 1990
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. EalyOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
- State v. PowersOhio Court of Appeals · 1995
- State v. McMillen, 2008-Ca-00122 (1-20-2009)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009
- State v. SecessionsOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
- State v. Howard, 06ap-1273 (10-23-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.