Legal Opinion

Norris v. Sibert & Robinson

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 9, 1936No. 25342PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSutton, J.

Norris, administratrix, brought suit in the municipal court of Augusta on a contract between her intestate and the defendants. The case was tried before the judge without a jury, and a judgment was rendered for the defendants. The plaintiff presented her petition to the superior court for certiorari. The answer of the trial judge was as follows: “The court can not intelligently answer the within certiorari, due to the fact that some of the documents of the records in the said cause, which were the main issue, have been withheld by the plaintiff, such as bills, a year’s support, letters, etc.…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Knowles v. CoachmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
  2. Ford v. ToomerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  3. Stoner v. MaginsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  4. Davis v. RhodesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  5. Sutton v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lunsford v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1939
  2. Maddox v. City of NewnanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
  3. Stone v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API