Seeger v. Keech
Baltimore City Circuit Court
1Opinion of the Court
FRANK. J.
The case presented by the bill of complaint is one for reimbursement by some of the bondholders of the Big-Vein Pocahontas Coal Company as against the defendants, directors of that company, for loss alleged to have been suffered by the complainants under the circumstances set forth in the bill. The bill is a voluminous one and sets out numerous and complicated facts. Those essential to this decision may he summarized as follows:
The complainants together are the owners of $52,000 par value of class “B” bonds, secured by a mortgage deed of trust, hereinafter referred to as the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Booth v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1881
- Owens v. GraetzelCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1926
- Georges Creek Coal & Iron Company's Lessee v. DetmoldCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1851
- Baker v. BakerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1908
- Chelton v. GreenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1886
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.