Legal Opinion

Smith v. Gordon

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 7, 2004No. A04A0449PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Presiding Judge.

This case arises out of a transaction involving the sale of an automobile dealership from Irene Gordon to Lee Cavendar and Robert Smith. Gordon filed a motion for summary judgment to recover on a promissory note signed by Smith and Cavendar. The trial court granted Gordon’s motion for summary judgment, and Cavendar appeals. We find no error and affirm the trial court’s judgment.

1. When reviewing the grant or denial of a motion for summary judgment, this Court conducts a de novo review of the law and the evidence. To prevail at summary judgment, the moving party must…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Lau's Corp., Inc. v. HaskinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1991
  2. Kusuma v. Metametrix, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
  3. Pearson v. GeorgeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1953
  4. Hubert v. Beale Roofing, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
  5. Hart v. Trust Co. of ColumbusCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Stephens v. ALAN v. MOCK CONST. CO., INC.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
  2. AAF-McQuay, Inc. v. WillisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
  3. Bollea v. World Championship Wrestling, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
  4. TSELIOS Et Al. v. SARSOURCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2017
  5. Hampton Island, LLC v. HAOP, LLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API