Legal Opinion

In re Markowitz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 26, 1990PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

Petitioner, Departmental Disciplinary Committee (DDC) for *6the First Judicial Department, moves for an order, pursuant to 22 NYCRR 603.4 (e) (1) (i) and (iii), suspending respondent from the practice of law forthwith until such time as disciplinary matters pending before the DDC have been concluded.

Respondent, Irving Markowitz, was admitted to the practice of law by the Appellate Division, First Judicial Department, on February 4, 1929. At all times relevant herein, respondent has maintained an office for the practice of law in the First Department.

On August 2, 1989 and…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re PadillaNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. In re HaleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  3. In re WechslerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988

4Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re AmpelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  2. In re PinsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  3. In re GlantzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  4. In re MarkowitzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API