Legal Opinion

Eckler v. Terry

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 10, 1893PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to Jackson. (Peck, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the ojfinion.

1Opinion of the CourtG-rant, J.

February 7, 1879, one Noah H. Eckler made application for membership in the endowment rank of the order of the Knights of Pythias. He was admitted to membership, and his application and certificates designated his wife, Ella, as the beneficiary. October 19, 1885, he made applic-tion to be- transferred to the fourth-class. In this application he named, as the beneficiary, his wife, Ella Eckler, or, in ease of her death, his minor son, Charles W. Eckler. After the death of his wife, Ella, Mr. Eckler married the plaintiff. Upon his death the defendant was appointed guardian of Charles. Due proof…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. New York Life Insurance v. RakAppellate Court of Illinois · 1961
  2. Castellina v. VaughanWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Hurd v. Penn Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1920
  4. Supreme Assembly of United Artisans v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API