Legal Opinion

Hurd v. Penn Mutual Life Insurance

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 10, 1920No. 22,309; No. 22,512PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Shawnee district court, division No. 1; Robert D. Garver, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Mason, J.:

In an action upon a policy issued by the Penn Mutual Life Insurance Company to Arthur E. Pinkney, the company defended upon the ground that the insured in his lifetime had exercised an option to accept the surrender value. The district court having decided against this defense, the company did not appeal, but acquiesced in the judgment and paid into the court the amount due on the policy, for which there were several claimants. In virtue of the fact that the policy named as beneficiary Jennie E. Pinkney, the wife of the insured, who survived…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Moulor v. American Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Goodwin v. Provident Savings Life Assurance Ass'nSupreme Court of Iowa · 1896
  3. Titsworth v. TitsworthSupreme Court of Kansas · 1889
  4. Ogletree v. HutchinsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  5. Harding v. LittlehaleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Aetna Life Insurance v. WorpellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937
  2. Equitable Life Ins. v. DinoffDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API