Legal Opinion
Jack Development, Inc. v. Howard Eales, Inc.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided June 8, 1978No. 12570PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Per curiam
Appellant, Jack Development, Inc., intervened in a civil action pursuant to D.C.Code 1973, § 16-520, 1 and moved to quash a writ of attachment issued against property of the defendant which had been transferred to the intervenor. The intervenor now appeals the trial court’s denial of this motion. 2
Service of process by certified mail on John D. Howell, individually and as general partner of defendant Corcoran Limited Partnership, had been unsuccessful, D.C. Code 1973, § 13-431(a)(3), (b), and Howard Eales, Inc., and Tifco, Inc., sought jurisdiction over the defendant through a writ of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. California & Oregon Land Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
- May v. Le ClaireSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Moelle v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Morris v. WheatDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1896
- Rieffer v. Home Indemnity Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1948
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Matson Navigation Co. v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1996
- Cape Cod Bank & Trust Co. v. AvramDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1988
- Goldsmith v. William S. Bergman Associates, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998