Lodoen v. City Council
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Andrew N. Lodoen appealed to the district court for Marshall county from the decision of the canvassing board of the city of Warren declaring that license to sell intoxicating liquor was defeated at the annual election of 1912. The appeal was heard upon stipulated facts by Watts' and Grrindeland, JJ., who made findings and as conclusion of law affirmed the decision of the city council. From the judgment entered pursuant to the findings, A. N. Lodoen appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtIIqlt, J.
Chapter 44, subc. 5, § 5, subd. 2, p. 292, of the Special Laws of 1891, provide that “nothing contained in these articles of incorporation shall be so construed as to prevent the people of the city of Warren from deciding for themselves whether or not license shall be granted to any person or persons in said city to sell lager beer, spirituous, vinous, malt or fermented liquors; and the city recorder is hereby required, on a petition of ten (10) or more legal voters of Said city, at any time not less than ten (10) days before any annual city election, to give notice that the question of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State ex rel. Marr v. StearnsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
- Hopkins v. City of DuluthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
- State ex rel. Peacock v. Village Council of OsakisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
- State ex rel. Greene v. HugoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
3Cited by9 opinions
- Spickerman v. GoddardIndiana Supreme Court · 1914
- Association of Clerical Employees v. Brotherhood of Railway & Steamship ClerksCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1936
- Wilson v. Wasco CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1917
- Eikmeier v. SteffenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
- Anderson v. City of Le SueurSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.