Legal Opinion
In re Kleiman
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 14, 1985PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
Petitioner, Departmental Disciplinary Committee (DDC) for the First Judicial Department, moves for an order, pursuant to the Rules of the Appellate Division, First Department (22 NYCRR 603.4 [d]), confirming a report of a hearing panel, which includes findings of fact, conclusions of law, and a recommendation that respondent, Louis Edwin Kleiman (respondent), should be suspended from practice for a period of two years. In response to DDC’s motion, respondent cross-moves to disaffirm the report, insofar as it: (1) found him guilty of two allegations contained in part two of…
3Cases cited2 opinions
- In re O'HaraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- In re AndersonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1965
4Cited by6 opinions
- In re GlotzerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- In re FriedmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- In re GoffeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- In re BedellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- In re JagielaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.