Legal Opinion

In re Bedell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 31, 1991PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

Respondent, Mitchell Bedell, was admitted to the practice of *53law by the Second Judicial Department on February 25, 1976, and has maintained an office for the practice of law within the First Department.

On July 1, 1988, respondent pleaded guilty to a Supreme Court information charging him with three counts of forgery in the third degree, in violation of New York Penal Law § 170.05, a class A misdemeanor. He was sentenced to three years’ probation on each count to run concurrently, a $1,000 fine, and 250 hours of community service.

We suspended respondent from the practice of…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In re MarksAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
  2. In re HalperAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  3. In re BailyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
  4. In re KleimanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  5. In re BedellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

4Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re AndrionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  2. In re BedellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API