In re Judicial Ditch No. 7
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Catherine Owens, deeming herself aggrieved by "the final order of the district court for Blue Earth county, confirming and approving the reports of the engineer and viewers which assessed the benefits to her land, in proceedings to establish Judicial Ditch No. 7 in that county, demanded a jury trial.
Read the full summary
Catherine Owens, deeming herself aggrieved by "the final order of the district court for Blue Earth county, confirming and approving the reports of the engineer and viewers which assessed the benefits to her land, in proceedings to establish Judicial Ditch No. 7 in that county, demanded a jury trial. The matter was heard by Comstock, J., and a jury which found the benefits accruing to the southwest quarter of the southeast quarter of section 11, township 108, range 28 west, to be $1,500, and to the east half of the southeast quarter of section 10, town-. ship 108, range 28 west, to be $2,100.…
1Opinion of the CourtQuiNN, J.
Judicial Ditch No. 7, of Blue Barth county, was established in March, 1916. It consists of about four miles of tile work and cost approximately $15,200. The demandant, Catherine Owens, is the owner of the southeast quarter of section 10 and the southwest quarter of the southwest quarter of section 11, township 108 north, range 28 west. In assessing benefits for the project the viewers assessed the quarter section as one tract, $2,100, and the forty in section 11, $1,500. The owner, feeling aggrieved, served a demand for a jury, and the issue thus raised was tried in June of that year,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- In re Judicial Ditch No. 52Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
3Cited by1 opinion
- Huseby v. SchachererSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924