Legal Opinion
Huseby v. Schacherer
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided October 24, 1924No. 24,168PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Taylor, C.
On April 30, 1921, the district court of the county of Lac qui Parle duly established Judicial Ditch No. 4 of that county, and approved and confirmed the report of the viewers appointed to assess and determine the benefits and damages to the several tracts of land which would be affected by the construction of the ditch. A number of landowners, who will be designated as appellants hereafter, severally demanded jury trials to determine the amount of benefits and damages to their lands. These cases were tried in the following December, January and February, and resulted in reducing…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Lupkes v. Town of CliftonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
- State ex rel. Merrick v. District Court of Hennepin CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1885
- Gallagher v. Irish-American BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
- Morey v. City of DuluthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
- Connelly v. Carnegie Dock & Fuel Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Wilson v. City of Fergus FallsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
- Township of Normania v. County of Yellow MedicineSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
- Improvement of County Ditch No. 86, Branch 1 v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
- State v. HolmesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- In Re Delinquent Taxes for 1921Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.