Legal Opinion

Kirker v. W. M. McIntosh Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 23, 1944No. Appeal, 11PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Baldrige, J.,

The appeal in this compensation case is from a judgment entered on the award granted to the widow of Charles W. Kirker, who was killed as a result of overturning of defendant’s truck which he was driving. None of the facts are in dispute. -The only question before us is: Was the deceased in the course of his employment at the time of the fatal accident?

Kirker for a number of years was employed by defendant as a driver of a heater truck, equipped with a large water tank and a kerosene burner, used to heat cold road surfacing material in railroad tank cars. He lived in…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Paulin v. Williams Co., Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  2. Paulin v. Williams Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  3. Ginther v. J. P. Graham Transfer Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  4. Knowles v. Parker Wylie Carpet Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  5. Freeman v. Salem Reformed ChurchSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Shuman Estate v. WeberSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  2. Lints v. Delaware Bibbon Manufacturers, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  3. Heidtman v. Nevada Industrial CommissionNevada Supreme Court · 1962
  4. White v. MORRISSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  5. McCafferty v. Masten Transportation, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1965

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API