Cannon v. Polk County District Attorney
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM *
Appellants Philip Scott Cannon, Mathias Cannon, and Philip Scott Cannon, on behalf of his minor child, QC, appeal the district court’s orders granting the State Appellees’ and the Morrow Estate’s motions to dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) and the County and City Appellees’ motion for summary judgment. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and now affirm in part and reverse in part.
First, Appellants argue that the district court erred in ruling Claims 4, 13, and 14 for negligence are barred by Oregon’s 10-year statute of ultimate repose,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Buckley v. FitzsimmonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Briscoe v. LaHueSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Van de Kamp v. GoldsteinSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Genzler v. LonganbachCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Phillip Fry, Susan Fry v. Olin Melaragno, David W. Otto, Mark Barnes, Mark PenderyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Cannon v. Oregon Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
- Cannon v. Polk County/Polk County SheriffDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2014
- Gibson v. City of PortlandDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2024
- Latty v. Polk County Sheriff's OfficeDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2020
- Richard-Edward Lane v. Medford Oregon City Attorney’s Office and Jackson County District Attorney’s OfficeDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2025