Cannon v. Oregon Department of Justice
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtWollheim, P. J.
Under the Oregon Tort Claims Act (OTCA), a plaintiff cannot maintain a tort action against a public body, its officers, its employees, or its agents unless sufficient “notice of claim” is given “within 180 days after the alleged loss or injury.” ORS 30.275(2)(b). The notice requirement is satisfied by, among other things, “Commencement of an action on the claim” within that 180-day period. ORS 30.275(3)(c). The question in this case is what constitutes “commencement” for notice purposes. Plaintiff, who alleges that he was wrongfully imprisoned for murder, filed his tort action against various…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court · 2009
- Outdoor Media Dimensions Inc. v. StateOregon Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. CloutierOregon Supreme Court · 2011
- Stevens v. BisphamOregon Supreme Court · 1993
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Kutz v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
- Wilcox v. LES Schwab Tire Ctrs. of Or., Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
- Coyle v. BrownDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2024
- Danovan Maurice Pooler v. City of Portland and Abbas MireDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2026