Legal Opinion

Denhart Et Ux. v. Valicenti Et Ux.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 12, 1944No. Appeal, 141PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rhodes, J.,

Opinion by

This is an appeal by defendants from a final decree of the court below granting a mandatory injunction.

Plaintiffs allege in their bill of complaint that defendants (husband and wife), as upper adjoining property owners, repeatedly dumped dirt onto plaintiffs’ land without warrant and after notice to refrain. The prayer of the bill was for a preliminary injunction and for a mandatory injunction requiring defendants to build a retaining wall, to remove the dirt wrongfully dumped, and to restore plaintiffs’ property to its original condition. Defendants filed an answer.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Co. v. Sun Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  2. Gray v. Phila. & Reading Coal & Iron Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  3. Pennsylvania Railroad v. BogertSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
  4. Ramsey v. RamseySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  5. Baugh v. BergdollSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1910

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Gardner v. Allegheny CountySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  2. Bradley v. ValicentiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  3. Ochroch v. Kia-NourySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  4. Ludwig v. Creswald, Inc., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Montgomery County1956
  5. Gardner v. Allegheny CountySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API