Legal Opinion

Ludwig v. Creswald, Inc.

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Montgomery County

Decided January 25, 1956No. 23PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Forrest, J.,

Will a court of equity require the removal of the portion of branches of a landowner’s tree which extend over and endanger an adjoining owner’s property? Defendant herein has posed this question by preliminarily objecting to the complaint on the ground that plaintiffs have a full, complete and adequate remedy at law.

The well-pleaded averments of the complaint are admitted for purposes of considering this preliminary objection. Summarized they may be stated as follows: On numerous occasions branches of trees growing on defendant’s property but extending over plaintiffs’ ground and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Grandona v. LovdalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Stevens v. MoonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  3. Shevlin v. JohnstonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
  4. Ackerman v. EllisSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1911
  5. Tanner v. WallbrunnMissouri Court of Appeals · 1898

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lane v. WJ. Curry & SonsTennessee Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Richard Herring of Herring Chiropractic Clinic v. Lisbon Partners Credit Fund, Ltd.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  3. State of N.D. v. N.D. Insurance Reserve FundNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API