Ludwig v. Creswald, Inc.
Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Montgomery County
1Opinion of the Court
Forrest, J.,
Will a court of equity require the removal of the portion of branches of a landowner’s tree which extend over and endanger an adjoining owner’s property? Defendant herein has posed this question by preliminarily objecting to the complaint on the ground that plaintiffs have a full, complete and adequate remedy at law.
The well-pleaded averments of the complaint are admitted for purposes of considering this preliminary objection. Summarized they may be stated as follows: On numerous occasions branches of trees growing on defendant’s property but extending over plaintiffs’ ground and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Grandona v. LovdalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Stevens v. MoonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- Shevlin v. JohnstonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
- Ackerman v. EllisSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1911
- Tanner v. WallbrunnMissouri Court of Appeals · 1898
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Lane v. WJ. Curry & SonsTennessee Supreme Court · 2002
- Richard Herring of Herring Chiropractic Clinic v. Lisbon Partners Credit Fund, Ltd.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
- State of N.D. v. N.D. Insurance Reserve FundNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012