Pascal v. Donahue
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Clinton District Court. — Hon. A. P. Barker, Judge. Suit to enjoin interference with the plaintiffs’ fences, roadway or embankment. On hearing, the petition was dismissed. Plaintiffs appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtLadd, J.
Plaintiffs are owners of the S. E. % S. "W. % of section 9, and also the W. *4 of that section, and the E. 14 of section 8. The defendants own the N. E. % S. "W. % and. the W. y2 S. E. % of section 9, and the N. W. % N. E. % of section 16, and the E. 20 acres of the N. E. 14 N. "W. 14 of that section. The natural drainage from quite a large body of land from the north is over the N. E. 14 S. W. % of section 9, and through a swale extending therefrom to an artificial ditch in the forty below, that is, the S. E. % of the S. W. % of said section, belonging to plaintiffs. This ditch extend°s from…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Dorr v. SimmersonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
- Obe v. PattatSupreme Court of Iowa · 1911
- Parizek v. HinekSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
- Jontz v. NorthupSupreme Court of Iowa · 1912
- Miller v. HesterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1914
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Board of Supervisors v. Board of SupervisorsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1932
- Hunt v. SmithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1947
- Conklin v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1918
- Tennigkeit v. FergusonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1921
- Anton v. StankeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1933
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.