Legal Opinion

Anton v. Stanke

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided November 21, 1933No. 42047PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKindig, J.

As indicated in the preliminary statement, this action involves the wrongful diversion of surface waters. Nicholas Anton and Henry J. Mahood, the plaintiffs appellees, own farms north of the farm owned by the defendant appellant A. H. Stanke. Anton’s farm is west of that owned by Mahood. Between the farms of the appellees and the farm of the appellant Stanke there is a public highway. The highway runs in an easterly and westerly direction. On the highway, near the northeast corner of the farm owned by the appellant Stanke, and in the vicinity of the southeast comer of the farm owned by the…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Board of Supervisors v. Board of SupervisorsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1932
  2. Schofield v. CooperSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
  3. Obe v. PattatSupreme Court of Iowa · 1911
  4. Holmes v. Calhoun CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1896
  5. Lessenger v. City of HarlanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1918

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Jacobson v. CamdenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1945
  2. Droegmiller v. OlsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1949
  3. Fischer v. Chicago & North Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
  4. Owens v. Fayette CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1950
  5. Michael McKee and Diane McKee v. City of Council BluffsCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API