Dunn v. State

The appellant was convicted for manufacturing prohibited liquors.

It was permissible for the state to sliow that Lem Barrentine was a deputy sheriff of Tuscaloosa county at the time he raided the still.

Where objection was sustained to a question ashed a state’s witness on cross-examination, hut the witness answered the question, the defendant, getting full benefit of the answer, was not prejudiced by the ruling of the court, and such ruling is not reversible error.

That portion of the argument of the solicitor was as follows: “I tell you that this defendant is guilty” — was merely an argument…