Legal Opinion
Attorney Grievance Commission v. Klauber
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided February 10, 1981No. [Misc. (BV) No. 5, September Term, 1980.]PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.
This is the third time we have considered issues growing out of the mail fraud conviction of Gerald Ney Klauber, a member of the Maryland bar. This time we shall disbar.
Bar Counsel, acting on behalf of the Attorney Grievance Commission, filed a petition with us seeking disciplinary action against Klauber because he had been convicted of violating 18 U.S.C. § 1341 (1970) (mail fraud) and 18 U.S.C. § 1962 (1970) (racketeering). It was alleged that Klauber had violated Disciplinary Rules 1-102; 2-103 (B), (C), (D), and (F); 3-103; 5-107 (A); 7-101 (A) (3); 7-102 (A) (2-8, inclusive); and 9-102.
Pu…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Allen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Pereira v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Wilson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- United States v. Jerry R. BohonusCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Maryland State Bar Ass'n v. AgnewCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. KahnCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. SparrowCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. MandelCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1982
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. SaulCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
- In re K. B.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.