Legal Opinion

Six-Ten Corp. v. Oppell

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided June 25, 1945PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum Per Curiam.

The tenant’s occupancy of the basement apartment is in violation of láw. It thus became the duty of the landlord, after due notice from the Department of Housing and Buildings of the City of New York, to remove the tenant (Multiple Dwelling Law, § 216; Nordred Realties, Inc., v. Langley, 279 N. Y. 636). The fact that the landlord’s predecessor in title permitted the occupancy under a lease is not binding on the present landlord, nor may it override the provisions of law.

The final order should be reversed, and final order awarded to petitioner for possession of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Nordred Realties, Inc. v. LangleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1938

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. 220 West 42 Associates v. CohenAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1969
  2. 2 West 32nd Street Corp. v. LevineAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1951
  3. Janowitz v. JenkinsCity of New York Municipal Court · 1957
  4. Levine v. FinkelsteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1949
  5. Tompkins v. KornfeldAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1946

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API