Annette Lorraine Anderson v. McNeilab Inc., D/B/A McNeil Pharmaceutical
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Per curiam
Annette Anderson, joined by her husband, appeals an adverse summary judgment entered in her Louisiana diversity action against the defendant manufacturer of Zomax, a prescription drug. Zomax was prescribed by a physician for her use, when needed, for sinus problems. No sooner had she taken the first dose than she suffered a severe reaction, with — she claims — resulting residual damage to her heart. 1 We affirm.
Counsel for the Andersons defines as his sole issue advanced on appeal:
Whether summary judgment is appropriate on the adequacy of a warning accompanying a prescription drug.
We reject…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Cobb v. Syntex Laboratories, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1983
- Miller v. Upjohn Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1985
3Cited by16 opinions
- Stahl v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
- Willett v. Baxter International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
- Calhoun v. Hoffman-La Roche, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2000
- Estate of LaMontagne v. SquibbCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
- Williams v. Ciba-Geigy Corp.District Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1988
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.