Legal Opinion

Annette Lorraine Anderson v. McNeilab Inc., D/B/A McNeil Pharmaceutical

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided October 29, 1987No. 87-3198PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Per curiam

Annette Anderson, joined by her husband, appeals an adverse summary judgment entered in her Louisiana diversity action against the defendant manufacturer of Zomax, a prescription drug. Zomax was prescribed by a physician for her use, when needed, for sinus problems. No sooner had she taken the first dose than she suffered a severe reaction, with — she claims — resulting residual damage to her heart. 1 We affirm.

Counsel for the Andersons defines as his sole issue advanced on appeal:

Whether summary judgment is appropriate on the adequacy of a warning accompanying a prescription drug.

We reject…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cobb v. Syntex Laboratories, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1983
  2. Miller v. Upjohn Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1985

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Stahl v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
  2. Willett v. Baxter International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
  3. Calhoun v. Hoffman-La Roche, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2000
  4. Estate of LaMontagne v. SquibbCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
  5. Williams v. Ciba-Geigy Corp.District Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1988

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API