Legal Opinion

United States v. Ledesma

District Court, S.D. Texas

Decided March 29, 2012No. Case No. 1:10-CV-38Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

ANDREW S. HANEN, District Judge.

Before the Court is Plaintiffs (“Government” or “Plaintiff’) Motion for Summary Judgment. Doc. No. 5 (“Pl.’s Mot. Summ. J.”). Defendant Delfino Ledesma (“Le-desma” or “Defendant”) filed a response to this motion, and later filed an amended response. Doc. No. 10; Doc. No. 21 (“Def.’s Am. Resp.”). Plaintiff timely filed a reply memorandum in support of its motion for summary judgment, and this Court held a hearing in which it heard oral argument concerning this motion. Doc. No. 13 (“Pl.’s Reply”). The Court, after considering the motion,…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Kungys v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Schneiderman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API