Hill v. State

RUFFIN, Presiding Judge.

A jury found Velisha Hill guilty of burglary, aggravated battery, and aggravated assault.1 On appeal, Hill challenges the sufficiency of the evidence. She also contends that the trial court committed reversible error in failing to ask “the potential jurors the statutorily required questions under oath.” For reasons that follow, we affirm.

1. On appeal from a criminal conviction, Hill no longer enjoys a presumption of innocence, and we view the evidence in a light most favorable to the jury’s verdict.2 “We do not weigh the evidence or determine witness credibility, but…