Legal Opinion

London v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 22, 2001No. A00A1989PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Smith, Presiding Judge.

After a joint trial with co-defendant James Howard, Tycion London was found guilty by a jury of burglary, two counts of false imprisonment, and two counts of aggravated assault. His motion for new trial, as amended, was denied. He appeals following the grant of his motion to file an out-of-time appeal. London raises five enumerations of error: He challenges the denial of his motions to sever trial and for a directed verdict of acquittal, the testimony of a co-defendant who pleaded guilty before trial, and a jury instruction; he also raises the general grounds. We find…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Milam v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1986
  4. Larry v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1996
  5. Battles v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1992

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Ham v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
  2. Morgan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
  3. Lawson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
  4. Harris v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
  5. Howard v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API