Legal Opinion
Wagner v. Messner, Aud.
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided April 24, 1940No. 27900PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court.
The principal question of law involved is stated by counsel for plaintiffs, appellants herein, as follows:
“Where a property owner did not avail himself of his statutory remedies, is he barred from seeking to enjoin, under Section 12075 of the General Code, the collection of assessments for the construction of a sanitary sewer, the proceedings for which were properly had and notice given before the improvement was made, when the circumstances are such that the improvement was not and cannot be of any benefit to his land?” (Italics ours.)
The Court of Appeals relied upon the case of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- City of Cuyahoga Falls v. BeckOhio Supreme Court · 1924
- Hammond v. WinderOhio Supreme Court · 1925
3Cited by5 opinions
- Tiemann v. University of CincinnatiOhio Court of Appeals · 1998
- Domito v. Village of MaumeeOhio Supreme Court · 1942
- Wolfe v. City of AvonOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- Bollenbacher v. Wayne Cty. Bd. of Commrs.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2012
- Krock v. DayCuyahoga County Probate Court · 1966