Legal Opinion · Dissent

Long v. Lampton

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 28, 1996No. 95-774Published

1DissentTom Glaze, Justice

Trial attorneys and members of the bench should take particular note of this decision, because it represents this court’s change in case law involving the giving and prejudicial effect of (1) erroneous conflicting jury instructions and (2) inherently erroneous instructions. As this court ruled in Alpha Zeta Chapter of Pi Kappa Alpha Fraternity v. Sullivan, 293 Ark. 576, 740 S.W.2d 127 (1987), it is settled law that it is prejudicial error for the court to give instructions which are directly conflicting and calculated to mislead the jury. See also Chicago Mill & Lumber Co. v. Johnson, 104…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Skinner v. R.J. Griffin & Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  2. Reynolds v. AshabrannerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1949
  3. Bailey v. Rose Care CenterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
  4. Alpha Zeta Chapter of Pi Kappa Alpha Fraternity v. SullivanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
  5. Davis v. DavisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API