Legal Opinion

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Nasrallah

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided October 19, 2000No. 00-1677PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

On Motion for Interim Suspension Pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(5a)(A)(l)(b).

On September 18, 2000, and pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(5a)(A)(l)(b), relators, Office of Disciplinary Counsel and Dayton Bar Association, filed with this court a Motion for Interim Suspension Pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(5a), alleging that respondent, Fuad B. Nasrallah, a.k.a. Fuad Bahige Nasrallah, had committed numerous violations of the Code of Professional Responsibility and poses a substantial threat of serious harm to the public. On September 28, 2000, respondent filed a response.

Upon consideration thereof and pursuant to…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. NasrallahOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. NasrallahOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Disciplinary Counsel v. NasrallahOhio Supreme Court · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API