Legal Opinion

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Nasrallah

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 16, 2002No. 01-1254PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,.

In 1993, we suspended respondent, Fuad B. Nasrallah of Dayton, Ohio, Attorney Registration No. 0023893, from the practice of law for two years for failure to complete employment agreements with eighteen clients for representation in various immigration matters. We stayed the entire suspension provided that respondent make restitution to the clients and submit to probation for a two-year period. Disciplinary Counsel v. Nasrallah (1993), 67 Ohio St.3d 238, 617 N.E.2d 677. Now we are presented with a similar situation involving the same attorney.

On June 5, 2000, relators,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. SigallOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. NasrallahOhio Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. NasrallahOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. NardiOhio Supreme Court · 1991

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lorain County Bar Ass'n v. FernandezOhio Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Columbus Bar Ass'n v. FosterOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Disciplinary Counsel v. NasrallahOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Columbus Bar Assn. v. FosterOhio Supreme Court · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API