Legal Opinion

Stangl v. Todd

Utah Supreme Court

Decided September 2, 1976No. 14105PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAUGHAN, Justice.

Plaintiff, a building contractor, brought this action to foreclose a mechanic’s lien, for construction work performed pursuant to an agreement to build a high-rise apartment complex. Defendants filed a counterclaim seeking damages, for plaintiff’s breach of a construction contract. Upon trial to the court, after allowing an offset for labor and materials furnished by plaintiff, defendants were awarded damages of $340,877. Plaintiff appeals.

Answers to two questions are definitive of this appeal. Was there a contract, and did the trial court adopt the correct measure of damage?…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Driggs v. Utah Teachers Retirement BoardUtah Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Robinson & Wilson, Inc. v. StoneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
  3. Blecick v. School District No. 18 of Cochise CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
  4. Mohr Park Manor, Inc. v. MohrNevada Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Ross v. Danter Associates, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1968

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Tri-County Electric Ass'n v. City of GilletteWyoming Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Coulter & Smith, Ltd. v. RussellUtah Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Andrulis v. Levin Construction Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
  4. Sachs v. LesserCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2007
  5. Traco Steel Erectors, Inc. v. Comtrol, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2009

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API