Stangl v. Todd
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
MAUGHAN, Justice.
Plaintiff, a building contractor, brought this action to foreclose a mechanic’s lien, for construction work performed pursuant to an agreement to build a high-rise apartment complex. Defendants filed a counterclaim seeking damages, for plaintiff’s breach of a construction contract. Upon trial to the court, after allowing an offset for labor and materials furnished by plaintiff, defendants were awarded damages of $340,877. Plaintiff appeals.
Answers to two questions are definitive of this appeal. Was there a contract, and did the trial court adopt the correct measure of damage?…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Driggs v. Utah Teachers Retirement BoardUtah Supreme Court · 1943
- Robinson & Wilson, Inc. v. StoneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- Blecick v. School District No. 18 of Cochise CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
- Mohr Park Manor, Inc. v. MohrNevada Supreme Court · 1967
- Ross v. Danter Associates, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1968
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Tri-County Electric Ass'n v. City of GilletteWyoming Supreme Court · 1978
- Coulter & Smith, Ltd. v. RussellUtah Supreme Court · 1998
- Andrulis v. Levin Construction Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
- Sachs v. LesserCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2007
- Traco Steel Erectors, Inc. v. Comtrol, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2009
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.