Legal Opinion

A.D. Sutton & Sons v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided July 16, 2008No. Court 03-00510Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RESTANI, Chief Judge:

This matter is before the court on cross-motions for summary judgment by plaintiff A.D. Sutton & Sons (“A.D. Sutton”) and defendant United States (“the Government”). A.D. Sutton challenges the classification for tariff purposes of its imported merchandise, bags that it claims are used to store baby food and beverages. The United States Bureau of Customs and Border Protection (“Customs”) classified the bags under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (1998) (“HTSUS”) subheading 4202.92.45 as other “[t]ravel, sports and similar bags” at 20% ad valorem,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Orlando Food Corp. v. StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
  2. United States v. Stone & Downer Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
  3. Carl Zeiss, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
  4. Universal Electronics Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
  5. Bausch & Lomb, Incorporated v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API