Shumway v. Kitzman
South Dakota Supreme Court
Appeal from Circuit Court, Spink Count)’. Hon. A uva E. Tayuor, Judge. Action by George Shumway against Mike Kitzman. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtAvhiting, J.
This action was brought by the plaintiff and respondent to enforce specific performance of an alleged contract for the purchase and sale of certain lands in Spink county. In his original complaint, the plaintiff alleged an oral contract. This complaint having been demurred to, plaintiff asked and was granted leave to serve and file an amended complaint. In this amended complaint, he alleged a contract, without stating whether the same was oral or in writing. The plaintiff was required to make' his complaint more specific, and did so by alleging a contract' in writing, entered into on or about…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Salmon Falls Manufacturing Co. v. GoddardSupreme Court of the United States · 1853
- Ringer v. HoltzclawSupreme Court of Missouri · 1892
- Halsell v. RenfrowSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Atlee v. BartholomewWisconsin Supreme Court · 1887
- Raub v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Boekelheide v. SnyderSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1947
- Wilson v. BeatyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919
- Reedy v. EbsenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1932
- Stevens v. PalmourCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
- Habeck v. SampsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.