Legal Opinion

Oran Edward HAMILTON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 5, 1995No. 94-56095PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

O’SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judge:

We must determine whether a court, in resentencing a defendant pursuant to a retroactive amendment to the Sentencing Guidelines, must apply the Guidelines in effect at the time of the resentencing or those in effect at the time of the offense.

I

In October 1989, an agent of the Bureau of Alcohol, Firearms and Tobacco discovered that Oran Hamilton had purchased a Moss-berg 12-gauge shotgun earlier that month from Western Surplus in Los Angeles, California. At the time of purchase, Hamilton had three prior felony convictions for drug-related offenses.

Hamilton ultimately…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hughes v. RoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Weaver v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. United States v. AddonizioSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Miller v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. United States v. TimmreckSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Tilahun Fantaye Desta v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  2. Shakur v. SchriroCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  3. Neal v. ShimodaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
  4. John J. Zichko v. State of Idaho Larry Wright, Warden Alan LanceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  5. United States v. Omar QaziCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API