Legal Opinion

A. B. Dick Co. v. Henry

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

Decided April 24, 1896PublishedCited by 3 opinions

This was a suit in equity by the A. B. Dick -Company against defendant, Sidney Henry, for alleged infringement of a patent.

1Opinion of the Court

TOWNSEND, District Judge.

Complainant herein, by this bill, charges infringement of patent No. 377,706, granted to John Brodrick February 7, 1888, for prepared sheets for stencils, alleged to belong to complainant. The answer sets up the usual defenses. *389The accurate definition of the invention, aud exhaustive discussion of the patent and prior art, by Judge Green in A. B. Dick Co. v. Fuerth, 57 Fed. 834, dispense with the necessity of referring in detail to the matters therein considered. The decree was vacated as collusive; bnt I concur with Judge Wheeler in his opinion in A. B. Dick Co. v.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Smith v. NicholsSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  2. Burt v. EvorySupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  3. A. B. Dick Co. v. FuerthU.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey · 1893
  4. A. B. Dick Co. v. WichelmanU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1895

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. A. B. Dick Co. v. Underwood Typewriter, Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1917
  2. A. B. Dick Co. v. WichelmanU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1897
  3. American Graphophone Co. v. WalcuttU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1898

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API