Legal Opinion

American Graphophone Co. v. Walcutt

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

Decided January 11, 1898Published

This was a suit in equity by the American Graphophone Company against Cleveland Walcutt for alleged infringement of two patents for recording and reproducing speech and other sounds.

1Opinion of the Court

WHEELER, District Judge.

This suit is brought upon patent Ho. 841,214, granted to Chichester A. Bell and Samuel Tainter, and Ho. 341,288, granted to Tainter, dated May 4, 1886, for recording and reproducing speech and other sounds. As to the parts in question, the inventors in the first patent say:

“The invention consists, secondly, in engraving or cutting the record in a waxy or amorphous and slightly cohesive substance; preferably a compound of beeswax and paraffine (the latter in excess) is employed. This compound has no tendency to clog the style, hut is readily removed thereby in chips or…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Railway Co. v. SaylesSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. American Graphophone Co. v. AmetU.S. Circuit Court for the Northern District of Illnois · 1896
  3. A. B. Dick Co. v. FuerthU.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey · 1893
  4. A. B. Dick Co. v. WichelmanU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1895
  5. A. B. Dick Co. v. HenryU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1896

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API