Hill v. Wilson
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHarris, J.
It will be impossible to understand the points urged by Wilson unless the discussion is prefaced by a statement of some of the admitted facts and a somewhat detailed account of the story told by the plaintiff and his witnesses and a brief recital of the story told by Wilson. And it may be here explained that Hill’s and Wilson’s recitals of most of the conversations are so -different one from the other that as to each conversation the recital of one is literally antipodal to the other.
Hill maintained an office in La Grande; and he was the local agent of the Amstel Mortgage Company of Spokane.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Glenn v. SavageOregon Supreme Court · 1887
- Sargent v. FolandOregon Supreme Court · 1922
- West v. EleyOregon Supreme Court · 1901
- Waite v. WillisOregon Supreme Court · 1902
- Keene v. EldriedgeOregon Supreme Court · 1905
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Tracy & Baker v. City of AstoriaOregon Supreme Court · 1951