Legal Opinion

Hill v. Wilson

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 17, 1923PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtHarris, J.

It will be impossible to understand the points urged by Wilson unless the discussion is prefaced by a statement of some of the admitted facts and a somewhat detailed account of the story told by the plaintiff and his witnesses and a brief recital of the story told by Wilson. And it may be here explained that Hill’s and Wilson’s recitals of most of the conversations are so -different one from the other that as to each conversation the recital of one is literally antipodal to the other.

Hill maintained an office in La Grande; and he was the local agent of the Amstel Mortgage Company of Spokane.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Glenn v. SavageOregon Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Sargent v. FolandOregon Supreme Court · 1922
  3. West v. EleyOregon Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Waite v. WillisOregon Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Keene v. EldriedgeOregon Supreme Court · 1905

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Tracy & Baker v. City of AstoriaOregon Supreme Court · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API