Legal Opinion

J.T. v. District of Columbia

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided January 23, 2023No. Civil Action No. 2019-0989Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA J.T., Plaintiff, Civil Action Nos. 19-cv-989 (BAH), v. 22-cv-91 (BAH) DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Chief Judge Beryl A. Howell Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff J.T. seeks attorneys’ fees and costs, totaling $415,042.55, 1 pursuant to the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (“IDEA”), 20 U.S.C. § 1415(i)(3)(B)(i)(1), from the District of Columbia (“the District”) for her counsel’s services in connection with two administrative due process proceedings she has pursued over the previous six years on behalf of her minor son. Pl.’s…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Wilson v. GarciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Lampf, Pleva, Lipkind, Prupis & Petigrow v. GilbertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Perdue v. Kenny A. ex rel. WinnSupreme Court of the United States · 2010

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API