Legal Opinion

Bankers Health & Life Insurance v. Crozier

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided May 14, 1941No. 13632PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Jenkins, Justice.

Where no power of divestiture is reserved in a policy of life insurance, the issuance of the policy confers a vested right upon the person named therein as beneficiary, and the insured can not transfer such interest to any other person without the consent of such beneficiary. Perry v. Tweedy, 128 Ga. 402 (57 S. E. 782, 119 Am. St. R. 393, 11 Ann. Cas. 46); Smith v. Head, 75 Ga. 755; Baldwin v. Wheat, 170 Ga. 449, 453 (153 S. E. 194). The rule is different, however, where a power to change the beneficiary or to assign the policy is reserved to the insured by the terms of the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Nally v. NallySupreme Court of Georgia · 1885
  2. Merchants Bank v. GarrardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1924
  3. Roberts v. Northwestern National Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1915
  4. Farmers State Bank v. KelleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1923
  5. Perry v. TweedySupreme Court of Georgia · 1907

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Knight v. WingateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
  2. Hudson v. HudsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1965
  3. Wimbush v. LyonsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1948
  4. Taylor v. Aetna Life Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
  5. Willis v. FrazierCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API