Legal Opinion

City of San Antonio v. Bynum

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 2, 1996No. 04-96-00620-CVPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

2Per curiam

The appellants, the City of San Antonio and its police officer, Kenneth Davis, appeal the denial of summary judgment based on *652official immunity. When this court ordered appellants to show cause why the appeal should not be dismissed for want of prosecution, Davis filed a motion for extension of time in which to file his brief; the City filed a motion to adopt Davis’s brief; and appellee Sharon Bynum filed two motions to dismiss the appeal. We retain the appeal on our docket and permit the City to adopt Davis’s brief.

Extension of Time in Accelerated Appeals

Appeals…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Fibreboard Corp. v. PoolCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1991
  2. City of Beverly Hills v. GuevaraTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Antu v. Eddy, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1995
  4. City of Beverly Hills v. Guevara, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1994
  5. Spring v. BollenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1996

4Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dallas Independent School District v. Finlan, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2000
  2. City of San Antonio v. BynumCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1996
  3. Jay Kay Bear Ltd v. Patty Martin, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API