Antu v. Eddy
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
Appellants Louis Antu and Bexar County bring this interlocutory appeal from the trial court’s denial of their amended motion for summary judgment based on official immunity. Appellants challenge the denial of summary judgment in two related points of error. We affirm in part and reverse and render in part.
SUMMARY JUDGMENT PRINCIPLES
The law governing review of a trial court’s order on a motion for summary judgment is well-settled. A defendant moving for summary judgment on an affirmative defense must conclusively prove all elements of that defense. Swilley v. Hughes, 488 S.W.2d 64, 67…
3Cases cited12 opinions
- Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
- Montgomery v. KennedyTexas Supreme Court · 1984
- City of Lancaster v. ChambersTexas Supreme Court · 1994
- Swilley v. HughesTexas Supreme Court · 1972
- Kassen v. HatleyTexas Supreme Court · 1994
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by24 opinions
- O'BRYANT v. City of Midland, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1997
- United States v. BlountCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
- Medina County Commissioners' Court v. Integrity Group, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1996
- United States v. Donnie Lamont Blount Gaylin Terod JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
- Texas Department of Public Safety v. Tanner, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1996
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.