Legal Opinion

Freel v. Center, Inc.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 20, 1961PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHiggiNS, J.

This appeal presents for review the order sustaining Bryson’s demurrer. A demurrer must be sustained if the challenged pleading (complaint or crosscomplaint) fails to allege each material fact necessary to constitute a cause of action. Ledwell v. Proctor, 221 N.C. 161, 19 S.E. 2d 234. Facts and not conclusions must be alleged. Broadway v. Asheboro, 250 N.C. 232, 108 S.E. 2d 441.

The original defendant alleged it had a contract with Bryson to do the excavation and grading out of which this controversy arose. The agreement provided the “contractor shall use reasonable care in the protection of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Ledwell v. ProctorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  2. Broadway v. Town of AsheboroSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Brevard v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  2. Allied Mortgage & Development Co. v. PittsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API