Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Ledwell v. Proctor

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 25, 1942PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBakNHILL, J.

The demurrer interposed in the court below was properly overruled. It fails to point out any defect in the complaint which would entitle the defendant to a dismissal of the action.

In this Court the defendant interposed a demurrer ore tenus for that it appears upon the face of the complaint that it fails to state or set out a cause of action or to state or set out facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. This demurrer was reduced to writing and points out in detail the alleged deficiencies in the complaint, in substance as follows ; for that it is not alleged: (1) that the returns…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Robertson v. JacksonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  2. State Ex Rel. Gatling v. BooneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887
  3. State Ex Rel. Cohoon v. SwainSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  4. Burgin v. North Carolina State Board of ElectionsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  5. Harkrader v. . LawrenceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Freeman v. PonderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  2. Ponder v. JoslinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  3. McPherson v. City Council of City of BurlingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  4. In Re Election Protest of FletcherCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
  5. Freel v. Center, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1961

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API