Legal Opinion

In re Grand Jury Investigation

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided October 3, 2001PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The order of the Superior Court judge is interlocutory for purposes of S.J.C. Rule 2:21 (1), 421 Mass. 1303 (1995), so we consider whether the petitioner has met the requirement of the second paragraph of the rule that he “set forth the reasons why review of the trial court decision cannot adequately be obtained on appeal from any final adverse judgment in the trial court or by other available means.” The petitioner contends that certain motions and procedures available to one who has been indicted are not available; there is no other remedy; review now is appropriate, citing Matter of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In the Matter of LavigneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994
  2. In re Grand Jury InvestigationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
  3. Commonwealth v. DowneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
  4. Cummins v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. White v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2003
  2. Commonwealth v. BertiniMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2013
  3. Glawson v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
  4. Brown v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API