Legal Opinion

In the Matter of Lavigne

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided November 16, 1994PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNolan, J.

This appeal by Richard R. Lavigne from a Superior Court judge’s order denying his motion for the return of a sample of his blood and allowing the Commonwealth’s motion for access to the blood sample requires us to decide whether, and if so, in what circumstances, a judge may order a person not charged with a criminal offense nor the subject of a grand jury investigation to have blood extracted from his body. Because we decide that the compelled extraction of a person’s blood for the purpose of testing its immutable characteristics to assist the Commonwealth in investigating a crime without…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Gerstein v. PughSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Warden, Maryland Penitentiary v. HaydenSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. In re of an Investigation into the Death of Jon L.New York Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. Commonwealth v. MurrayMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ConnollyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2009
  2. Commonwealth v. D'AmourMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1999
  3. Commonwealth v. MilesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
  4. State v. GrantSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
  5. Landry v. Attorney GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1999

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API