Legal Opinion

Paige v. Jurgensen

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 4, 1992No. A92A0513PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Beasley, Judge.

In consideration for sale of stock owned by the appellees Jurgensen and Auer in a restaurant business, the appellants Paige and Beam entered into a written agreement to indemnify, release and hold harmless the sellers from any and all claims on a note and guaranty in the original principal amount of $61,350 and other costs resulting from default on the note. The buyers began operating the restaurant, the note went into default, and appellees were called upon to pay off their pro rata share. They were unsuccessful in obtaining indemnification from the buyers, so they sued to…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Health Service Centers, Inc. v. BoddySupreme Court of Georgia · 1987
  2. Crooks v. CrimCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
  3. Lacey v. HutchinsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
  4. Weaver v. CosbySupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
  5. Cooper v. VaughanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1950

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Whittington v. Dragon Group, L.L.C.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2009
  2. Mabry v. PeltonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
  3. Rod's Auto Finance, Inc. v. Finance Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
  4. Metlife v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
  5. B & C Tire & Battery, Inc. v. Cooper Tire & Rubber Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1994

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API